linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH V4 6/6] riscv: soc: Add Allwinner SoC kconfig option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAK8P3a1TY+XT1vF=wAh0XA5BXU5Z6Ab1d4DekXbVsN9aj3aL5w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Sep 2021 11:29:41 +0200
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
To:     Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org>
Cc:     Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech>,
        Anup Patel <anup.patel@....com>,
        Atish Patra <atish.patra@....com>,
        Palmer Dabbelt <palmerdabbelt@...gle.com>,
        Christoph Müllner <christoph.muellner@...ll.eu>,
        philipp.tomsich@...ll.eu, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>,
        liush <liush@...winnertech.com>, wefu@...hat.com,
        Wei Wu (吴伟) <lazyparser@...il.com>,
        Drew Fustini <drew@...gleboard.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        taiten.peng@...onical.com, aniket.ponkshe@...onical.com,
        heinrich.schuchardt@...onical.com, gordan.markus@...onical.com,
        Guo Ren <guoren@...ux.alibaba.com>,
        Chen-Yu Tsai <wens@...e.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH V4 6/6] riscv: soc: Add Allwinner SoC kconfig option

On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 4:36 AM Guo Ren <guoren@...nel.org> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 2:49 AM Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org> wrote:
> > On 9/13/21 2:20 AM, Guo Ren wrote:
> > > On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 4:45 PM Maxime Ripard <maxime@...no.tech> wrote:
> > >> On Sat, Sep 11, 2021 at 05:21:39PM +0800, guoren@...nel.org wrote:
> > >>> From: Liu Shaohua <liush@...winnertech.com>
> > >>>
> > >>> Add Allwinner kconfig option which selects SoC specific and common
> > >>> drivers that is required for this SoC.
> > >>>
> > >>> Allwinner D1 uses custom PTE attributes to solve non-coherency SOC
> > >>> interconnect issues for dma synchronization, so we set the default
> > >>> value when SOC_SUNXI selected.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> +config SOC_SUNXI
> > >>> +     bool "Allwinner SoCs"
> > >>> +     depends on MMU
> > >>> +     select DWMAC_GENERIC
> > >>> +     select ERRATA_THEAD
> > >>> +     select RISCV_DMA_NONCOHERENT
> > >>> +     select RISCV_ERRATA_ALTERNATIVE
> > >>> +     select SERIAL_8250
> > >>> +     select SERIAL_8250_CONSOLE
> > >>> +     select SERIAL_8250_DW
> > >>> +     select SIFIVE_PLIC
> > >>> +     select STMMAC_ETH
> > >>> +     help
> > >>> +       This enables support for Allwinner SoC platforms like the D1.
> > >>> +
> > >>
> > >> I'm not sure we should select the drivers there. We could very well
> > >> imagine a board without UART, or even more so without ethernet.
> > > We just want people could bring D1 up easier, 8250 is the basic component.
> > >
> > >
> > >>
> > >> These options should be in the defconfig.
> >
> > Agreed, using a defconfig is the right way to do this.
> Put 8250 related configs into arch/riscv/configs/defconfig?

I think that would be best, as well as the STMMAC_ETH and
DWMAC_GENERIC options.

If all RISC-V chips are required to have a 8250 compatible uart,
selecting it from CONFIG_RISCV would work as well, but for
consistency I'd give users the option to leave it out, just like
any other driver that is not required to have a useful system.

>  @Palmer Dabbelt @Arnd Bergmann, How do you think about that?
> (defconfig or Kconfig.soc)
> My purpose is when people make the Image from riscv/defconfig, then
> the Image could run on all platforms include D1.

I would try to keep the Kconfig.soc as short as possible. As a general
rule, only use 'select' to enable symbols that are otherwise not user
visible, such as the specific errata if you want to hide them. For individual
SoCs, I prefer not having separate Kconfig options, but instead have
those per driver. We have some SoC families that have part specific
options elsewhere, e.g. drivers/soc/renesas/Kconfig, but I'd only add
those if you can't avoid it. Having it in drivers/soc/ may be better for
sunxi than spreading them over arch/{arm,arm64,riscv}.

Some subsystem maintainers want drivers to be selected by the SoC
option, this is why you need the 'select SIFIVE_PLIC', but usually
the drivers are selectable with a 'depends on ARCH_SUNXI ||
COMPILE_TEST' and enabled in the defconfig.

If you want to get fancy, you can use something like:

config RESET_SUNXI
        bool "Allwinner SoCs Reset Driver" if COMPILE_TEST && !ARCH_SUNXI
        default ARCH_SUNXI

This will make an option that
 - always enabled when the platform is built-in
 - user selectable when compile-testing for any other platform
 - always disabled otherwise

       Arnd