[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABoTLcSdkmuBxd5Yh6z2Oqm1-_Vd4J5Ni1i1qq5s07mWu7Ndew@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Sep 2021 08:41:36 -0400
From: Oskar Senft <osk@...gle.com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: linux-hwmon@...r.kernel.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Jean Delvare <jdelvare@...e.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] dt-bindings: hwmon: Add nct7802 bindings
Hi Guenter
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-hwmon/cover.1631021349.git.krzysztof.adamski@nokia.com/
>
> That specifically includes the ability to enable or disable channels
> using the standard 'status' property. While that series is primarily
> for the n-factor property supported by the tmp421, the same approach
> can be used for [temperature] sensor properties on other chips as well.
Good pointer! I should be able to replicate that for the LTD (@0) and
RTDs (1, 2, 3) in a similar way.
> I put [temperature] in [] because we'd need to find a means to express
> if the sub-nodes are for temperature, voltage, or something else, but
> I think the basic principle is sound.
Following the example from tmp421, this could then be like this:
i2c {
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
nct7802@28 {
compatible = "nuvoton,nct7802";
reg = <0x28>;
#address-cells = <1>;
#size-cells = <0>;
/* LTD */
input@0 {
reg = <0x0>;
status = "okay";
/* No "mode" attribute here*/
label = "local temp";
};
/* RTD1 */
input@1 {
reg = <0x1>;
mode = <0x2>; /* 3904 transistor */
label = "voltage mode";
};
input@2 {
reg = <0x2>;
mode = <0x4>; /* thermistor */
label = "thermistor mode";
};
/* RTD3 */
input@3 {
reg = <0x3>;
mode = <0x3>; /* thermal diode */
label = "current mode";
status = "disabled";
};
};
};
I noticed that "nct7802_temp_is_visible" only allows the temperature
sensor to be visible for current and thermistor but not voltage. Is
that right?
Before I go and change the driver further, I'd like to make sure we
agree on the interface.
Also: Is nct7802_temp_is_visible called again after temp_type_store
was called (I didn't try it)?
Thanks
Oskar.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists