[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAFpoUr3APdFordH+1XjHPWP5FtKuQBAXSRTt4arruMkQcx2ufg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 19:59:27 +0100
From: Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>
To: Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>
Cc: Michal Koutný <mkoutny@...e.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Phil Auld <pauld@...hat.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ben Segall <bsegall@...gle.com>, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...hat.com>,
Odin Ugedal <odin@...d.al>, Rik van Riel <riel@...riel.com>,
Giovanni Gherdovich <ggherdovich@...e.cz>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v2 4/5] sched/fair: Simplify load_cfs_rq_list maintenance
ons. 15. sep. 2021 kl. 13:31 skrev Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>:
> The corner cases that I wanted to check, are covered by
> a7b359fc6a37 ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on unthrottle")
> and
> fdaba61ef8a2 ("sched/fair: Ensure that the CFS parent is added after
> unthrottling")
Still have some more of my testing stuff from when i discovered the issues
behind a7b359fc6a37 ("sched/fair: Correctly insert cfs_rq's to list on
unthrottle") as
well, so will take a look at this patch later this week.
Need to wrap my head around this logic again, but the idea looks good
at first sight.
Thanks
Odin
Powered by blists - more mailing lists