[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAHk-=whSkMh9mc7+OSBZZvpoEEJmS6qY7kX3qixEXTLKGc=wgw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 12:50:22 -0700
From: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc: Richard Henderson <rth@...ddle.net>,
Ivan Kokshaysky <ink@...assic.park.msu.ru>,
Matt Turner <mattst88@...il.com>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
alpha <linux-alpha@...r.kernel.org>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org, Netdev <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Sparse Mailing-list <linux-sparse@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/4] Introduce and use absolute_pointer macro
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 12:47 PM Linus Torvalds
<torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> What other notable issues end up being still live? I sent out that one
> patch for sparc, but didn't get any response to it. I'm inclined to
> just apply it (the 'struct mdesc_hdr' pointer misuse one).
Oh, I forgot about the qnx4 one. That happens on sparc, possibly
others, but not on x86-64.
I'll go look at that patch too.
Linus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists