[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210915233343.3906738-14-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:33:43 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>,
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
"Paul E . McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 14/14] rcu: Avoid unneeded function call in rcu_read_unlock()
From: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Since commit aa40c138cc8f3 ("rcu: Report QS for outermost PREEMPT=n
rcu_read_unlock() for strict GPs") the function rcu_read_unlock_strict()
is invoked by the inlined rcu_read_unlock() function. However,
rcu_read_unlock_strict() is an empty function in production kernels,
which are built with CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD=n.
There is a mention of rcu_read_unlock_strict() in the BPF verifier,
but this is in a deny-list, meaning that BPF does not care whether
rcu_read_unlock_strict() is ever called.
This commit therefore provides a slight performance improvement
by hoisting the check of CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD from
rcu_read_unlock_strict() into rcu_read_unlock(), thus avoiding the
pointless call to an empty function.
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
include/linux/rcupdate.h | 3 ++-
kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h | 3 +--
2 files changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
diff --git a/include/linux/rcupdate.h b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
index 434d12fe2d4f..5e0beb5c5659 100644
--- a/include/linux/rcupdate.h
+++ b/include/linux/rcupdate.h
@@ -71,7 +71,8 @@ static inline void __rcu_read_lock(void)
static inline void __rcu_read_unlock(void)
{
preempt_enable();
- rcu_read_unlock_strict();
+ if (IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD))
+ rcu_read_unlock_strict();
}
static inline int rcu_preempt_depth(void)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
index d070059163d7..1a6fdb03d0a5 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tree_plugin.h
@@ -814,8 +814,7 @@ void rcu_read_unlock_strict(void)
{
struct rcu_data *rdp;
- if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_RCU_STRICT_GRACE_PERIOD) ||
- irqs_disabled() || preempt_count() || !rcu_state.gp_kthread)
+ if (irqs_disabled() || preempt_count() || !rcu_state.gp_kthread)
return;
rdp = this_cpu_ptr(&rcu_data);
rcu_report_qs_rdp(rdp);
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists