[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210915234604.3907802-2-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:45:53 -0700
From: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To: rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
"Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 02/13] rcu-tasks: Simplify trc_read_check_handler() atomic operations
Currently, trc_wait_for_one_reader() atomically increments
the trc_n_readers_need_end counter before sending the IPI
invoking trc_read_check_handler(). All failure paths out of
trc_read_check_handler() and also from the smp_call_function_single()
within trc_wait_for_one_reader() must carefully atomically decrement
this counter. This is more complex than it needs to be.
This commit therefore simplifies things and saves a few lines of
code by dispensing with the atomic decrements in favor of having
trc_read_check_handler() do the atomic increment only in the success case.
In theory, this represents no change in functionality.
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 20 +++-----------------
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 17 deletions(-)
diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 3b2f8038064a..c9d8583ffe59 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -890,32 +890,24 @@ static void trc_read_check_handler(void *t_in)
// If the task is no longer running on this CPU, leave.
if (unlikely(texp != t)) {
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_dec_and_test(&trc_n_readers_need_end)))
- wake_up(&trc_wait);
goto reset_ipi; // Already on holdout list, so will check later.
}
// If the task is not in a read-side critical section, and
// if this is the last reader, awaken the grace-period kthread.
if (likely(!READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting))) {
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_dec_and_test(&trc_n_readers_need_end)))
- wake_up(&trc_wait);
- // Mark as checked after decrement to avoid false
- // positives on the above WARN_ON_ONCE().
WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_checked, true);
goto reset_ipi;
}
// If we are racing with an rcu_read_unlock_trace(), try again later.
- if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting) < 0)) {
- if (WARN_ON_ONCE(atomic_dec_and_test(&trc_n_readers_need_end)))
- wake_up(&trc_wait);
+ if (unlikely(READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_nesting) < 0))
goto reset_ipi;
- }
WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_checked, true);
// Get here if the task is in a read-side critical section. Set
// its state so that it will awaken the grace-period kthread upon
// exit from that critical section.
+ atomic_inc(&trc_n_readers_need_end); // One more to wait on.
WARN_ON_ONCE(READ_ONCE(t->trc_reader_special.b.need_qs));
WRITE_ONCE(t->trc_reader_special.b.need_qs, true);
@@ -1015,21 +1007,15 @@ static void trc_wait_for_one_reader(struct task_struct *t,
if (per_cpu(trc_ipi_to_cpu, cpu) || t->trc_ipi_to_cpu >= 0)
return;
- atomic_inc(&trc_n_readers_need_end);
per_cpu(trc_ipi_to_cpu, cpu) = true;
t->trc_ipi_to_cpu = cpu;
rcu_tasks_trace.n_ipis++;
- if (smp_call_function_single(cpu,
- trc_read_check_handler, t, 0)) {
+ if (smp_call_function_single(cpu, trc_read_check_handler, t, 0)) {
// Just in case there is some other reason for
// failure than the target CPU being offline.
rcu_tasks_trace.n_ipis_fails++;
per_cpu(trc_ipi_to_cpu, cpu) = false;
t->trc_ipi_to_cpu = cpu;
- if (atomic_dec_and_test(&trc_n_readers_need_end)) {
- WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
- wake_up(&trc_wait);
- }
}
}
}
--
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23
Powered by blists - more mailing lists