linux-kernel - [PATCH rcu 13/13] rcu-tasks: Update comments to cond_resched_tasks_rcu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210915234604.3907802-13-paulmck@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 16:46:04 -0700
From:   "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
To:     rcu@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kernel-team@...com, mingo@...nel.org,
        jiangshanlai@...il.com, akpm@...ux-foundation.org,
        mathieu.desnoyers@...icios.com, josh@...htriplett.org,
        tglx@...utronix.de, peterz@...radead.org, rostedt@...dmis.org,
        dhowells@...hat.com, edumazet@...gle.com, fweisbec@...il.com,
        oleg@...hat.com, joel@...lfernandes.org,
        "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>,
        Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Subject: [PATCH rcu 13/13] rcu-tasks: Update comments to cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs()

The cond_resched_rcu_qs() function no longer exists, despite being mentioned
several times in kernel/rcu/tasks.h.  This commit therefore updates it to
the current cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs().

Reported-by: Neeraj Upadhyay <neeraju@...eaurora.org>
Signed-off-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org>
---
 kernel/rcu/tasks.h | 6 +++---
 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

diff --git a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
index 0c10c8407dca..66e7586a33e9 100644
--- a/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
+++ b/kernel/rcu/tasks.h
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@ static void rcu_tasks_wait_gp(struct rcu_tasks *rtp)
 ////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
 //
 // Simple variant of RCU whose quiescent states are voluntary context
-// switch, cond_resched_rcu_qs(), user-space execution, and idle.
+// switch, cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), user-space execution, and idle.
 // As such, grace periods can take one good long time.  There are no
 // read-side primitives similar to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock()
 // because this implementation is intended to get the system into a safe
@@ -539,7 +539,7 @@ DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rcu_tasks, rcu_tasks_wait_gp, call_rcu_tasks, "RCU Tasks");
  * period elapses, in other words after all currently executing RCU
  * read-side critical sections have completed. call_rcu_tasks() assumes
  * that the read-side critical sections end at a voluntary context
- * switch (not a preemption!), cond_resched_rcu_qs(), entry into idle,
+ * switch (not a preemption!), cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), entry into idle,
  * or transition to usermode execution.  As such, there are no read-side
  * primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() because
  * this primitive is intended to determine that all tasks have passed
@@ -677,7 +677,7 @@ DEFINE_RCU_TASKS(rcu_tasks_rude, rcu_tasks_rude_wait_gp, call_rcu_tasks_rude,
  * period elapses, in other words after all currently executing RCU
  * read-side critical sections have completed. call_rcu_tasks_rude()
  * assumes that the read-side critical sections end at context switch,
- * cond_resched_rcu_qs(), or transition to usermode execution (as
+ * cond_resched_tasks_rcu_qs(), or transition to usermode execution (as
  * usermode execution is schedulable). As such, there are no read-side
  * primitives analogous to rcu_read_lock() and rcu_read_unlock() because
  * this primitive is intended to determine that all tasks have passed
-- 
2.31.1.189.g2e36527f23