linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] vp_vdpa: add vq irq offloading support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210915033102.GB18793@L-PF27918B-1352.localdomain>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:31:02 +0800
From:   Wu Zongyong <wuzongyong@...ux.alibaba.com>
To:     Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
Cc:     virtualization <virtualization@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        mst <mst@...hat.com>, wei.yang1@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/5] vp_vdpa: add vq irq offloading support

On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 11:16:03AM +0800, Jason Wang wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 8:25 PM Wu Zongyong
> <wuzongyong@...ux.alibaba.com> wrote:
> >
> > This patch implements the get_vq_irq() callback for virtio pci devices
> > to allow irq offloading.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Wu Zongyong <wuzongyong@...ux.alibaba.com>
> 
> Acked-by: Jason Wang <jasowang@...hat.com>
> 
> (btw, I think I've acked this but it seems lost).
Yes, but this patch is a little different with the previous one.

And should I not send the patch again if one of the previous version
patch series have been acked by someone? It's the first time for me to
send patches to kernel community.
> 
> Thanks
> 
> > ---
> >  drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c | 12 ++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> > index 5bcd00246d2e..e3ff7875e123 100644
> > --- a/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> > +++ b/drivers/vdpa/virtio_pci/vp_vdpa.c
> > @@ -76,6 +76,17 @@ static u8 vp_vdpa_get_status(struct vdpa_device *vdpa)
> >         return vp_modern_get_status(mdev);
> >  }
> >
> > +static int vp_vdpa_get_vq_irq(struct vdpa_device *vdpa, u16 idx)
> > +{
> > +       struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa = vdpa_to_vp(vdpa);
> > +       int irq = vp_vdpa->vring[idx].irq;
> > +
> > +       if (irq == VIRTIO_MSI_NO_VECTOR)
> > +               return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > +       return irq;
> > +}
> > +
> >  static void vp_vdpa_free_irq(struct vp_vdpa *vp_vdpa)
> >  {
> >         struct virtio_pci_modern_device *mdev = &vp_vdpa->mdev;
> > @@ -427,6 +438,7 @@ static const struct vdpa_config_ops vp_vdpa_ops = {
> >         .get_config     = vp_vdpa_get_config,
> >         .set_config     = vp_vdpa_set_config,
> >         .set_config_cb  = vp_vdpa_set_config_cb,
> > +       .get_vq_irq     = vp_vdpa_get_vq_irq,
> >  };
> >
> >  static void vp_vdpa_free_irq_vectors(void *data)
> > --
> > 2.31.1
> >