[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <DM6PR04MB6575D4234BAE8E0537F5E400FCDB9@DM6PR04MB6575.namprd04.prod.outlook.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 05:52:16 +0000
From: Avri Altman <Avri.Altman@....com>
To: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
"James E . J . Bottomley" <jejb@...ux.vnet.ibm.com>,
"Martin K . Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>
CC: "linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-scsi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
Adrian Hunter <adrian.hunter@...el.com>,
Bean Huo <beanhuo@...ron.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v6 1/2] scsi: ufs: Probe for temperature notification
support
> > +static int ufs_hwmon_read(struct device *dev, enum
> hwmon_sensor_types type, u32 attr, int channel,
> > + long *val)
> > +{
> > + struct ufs_hwmon_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + struct ufs_hba *hba = data->hba;
> > + int err;
> > +
> > + if (type != hwmon_temp)
> > + return 0;
> > +
>
> Was that there before ? Dorry, I didn't notice.
> First of all, strictly speaking it is unnecessary, but if it is there
> it should return an error. Plus, checking the type here but not in
> the write function is a bit inconsistent.
Will remove. Done.
> > +static int ufs_hwmon_write(struct device *dev, enum
> hwmon_sensor_types type, u32 attr, int channel,
> > + long val)
> > +{
> > + struct ufs_hwmon_data *data = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
> > + struct ufs_hba *hba = data->hba;
> > + int err = 0;
>
> Still unnecessary.
Done.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists