linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: xilinx: Add sysfs support for feature config

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <BYAPR02MB4488F74E21490FC4801BA375A4DB9@BYAPR02MB4488.namprd02.prod.outlook.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 06:16:16 +0000
From:   Ronak Jain <ronakj@...inx.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC:     Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Rajan Vaja <RAJANV@...inx.com>,
        "corbet@....net" <corbet@....net>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        Sai Krishna Potthuri <lakshmis@...inx.com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: xilinx: Add sysfs support for feature
 config

Hi Greg KH,

Thanks for reviewing.

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
> Sent: Tuesday, September 14, 2021 2:51 PM
> To: Ronak Jain <ronakj@...inx.com>
> Cc: Michal Simek <michals@...inx.com>; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; Rajan
> Vaja <RAJANV@...inx.com>; corbet@....net; linux-arm-
> kernel@...ts.infradead.org; arnd@...db.de; Sai Krishna Potthuri
> <lakshmis@...inx.com>
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] firmware: xilinx: Add sysfs support for feature
> config
> 
> On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 01:39:55AM -0700, Ronak Jain wrote:
> > Add support for sysfs interface for runtime features configuration.
> >  The user can configure the features at runtime. First the user need
> > to select the config id of the supported features and then the user
> > can configure the parameters of the feature based on the config id.
> >  So far the support is added for the over temperature and external
> > watchdog features.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Ronak Jain <ronak.jain@...inx.com>
> > ---
> > Changes in v2:
> > - Update commit message
> > ---
> >  drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c | 71
> > ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> >  1 file changed, 71 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > index 875d13bc1a57..a1434dd368f2 100644
> > --- a/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > +++ b/drivers/firmware/xilinx/zynqmp.c
> > @@ -1361,6 +1361,75 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(pggs1);  static
> > DEVICE_ATTR_RW(pggs2);  static DEVICE_ATTR_RW(pggs3);
> >
> > +static atomic_t feature_conf_id;
> 
> Why does this have to be an atomic?
Use atomic to avoid race conditions. Suppose the case where the user is trying to write the variable and at the same time it tries to read, so there might be chances of occurrence of race condition. Also, I am not so sure whether the race condition will occur or not but just to prevent race condition I have used atomic variable so, the read/write operations can handle automatically.
> 
> And shouldn't this be per-device, not global to all devices in the system?
This is to store the config-id set by the user which will be used to retrieve config. There is only one firmware device so we can consider it systemwide. Please let me know if you think of a better way of handling it.
> 
> > +
> > +static ssize_t feature_config_id_show(struct device *device,
> > +				      struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +				      char *buf)
> > +{
> > +	return sysfs_emit(buf, "%d\n", atomic_read(&feature_conf_id)); }
> > +
> > +static ssize_t feature_config_id_store(struct device *device,
> > +				       struct device_attribute *attr,
> > +				       const char *buf, size_t count) {
> > +	u32 config_id;
> > +	int ret;
> > +
> > +	if (!buf)
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> 
> How can there ever be a NULL buffer?
> 
> No need to check for impossible things.
Will update in next version.

Thanks,
Ronak
> 
> thanks,
> 
> greg k-h