lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8d58d4cb-bc0b-30a9-6218-323c9ffd1037@redhat.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 10:44:09 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
        Peter Gonda <pgonda@...gle.com>
Cc:     kvm list <kvm@...r.kernel.org>, Marc Orr <marcorr@...gle.com>,
        Nathan Tempelman <natet@...gle.com>,
        Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: SEV: Disable KVM_CAP_VM_COPY_ENC_CONTEXT_FROM for
 SEV-ES

On 14/09/21 20:49, Sean Christopherson wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 14, 2021, Peter Gonda wrote:
>> I do not think so. You cannot call KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA on the mirror
>> because svm_mem_enc_op() blocks calls from the mirror. So either you have to
>> update vmsa from the mirror or have the original VM read through its mirror's
>> vCPUs when calling KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA. Not sure which way is better
>> but I don't see a way to do this without updating KVM.
> 
> Ah, right, I forgot all of the SEV ioctls are blocked on the mirror.  Put something
> to that effect into the changelog to squash any argument about whether or not this
> is the correct KVM behavior.

Indeed, at least KVM_SEV_LAUNCH_UPDATE_VMSA would have to be allowed in 
the mirror VM.  Do you think anything else would be necessary?

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ