linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc,device-width" DT property is optional

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 11:05:37 +0200
From:   Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzysztof.kozlowski@...onical.com>
To:     Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>, tony@...mide.com
Cc:     robh+dt@...nel.org, grygorii.strashko@...com, nm@...com,
        lokeshvutla@...com, nsekhar@...com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-omap@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 8/8] memory: gpmc-omap: "gpmc,device-width" DT property
 is optional

On 15/09/2021 10:47, Roger Quadros wrote:
> Hi Krzysztof,
> 
> On 15/09/2021 10:12, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote:
>> On 14/09/2021 14:27, Roger Quadros wrote:
>>> Check for valid gpmc,device-width, nand-bus-width and bank-width
>>> at one place. Default to 8-bit width if none present.
>>>
>>> Signed-off-by: Roger Quadros <rogerq@...nel.org>
>>> ---
>>>  drivers/memory/omap-gpmc.c | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++++++--------------
>>>  1 file changed, 26 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> All the comments from v3 are still applicable because it seems you
>> ignored them. Please respond to them.
>>
>> It's the second patch where the reviewer's comments got lost, so it
>> creates rather poor impression.
> 
> I was wondering what comments and then realized that gmail server has put
> all your messages into spam folder.
> 
> I'm very sorry about that. I will address your comments ASAP.

Oops. There were just two emails from me for v3. Can you send me
(privately) the headers from my emails so I can investigate why they
ended up on Spam?

Best regards,
Krzysztof