linux-kernel - [PATCH v9 8/8] xfs: Add dax dedupe support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Sep 2021 18:45:01 +0800
From:   Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
To:     <djwong@...nel.org>, <hch@....de>, <linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org>
CC:     <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>, <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
        <david@...morbit.com>, <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <nvdimm@...ts.linux.dev>,
        <rgoldwyn@...e.de>, <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>,
        <willy@...radead.org>
Subject: [PATCH v9 8/8] xfs: Add dax dedupe support

Introduce xfs_mmaplock_two_inodes_and_break_dax_layout() for dax files
who are going to be deduped.  After that, call compare range function
only when files are both DAX or not.

Signed-off-by: Shiyang Ruan <ruansy.fnst@...itsu.com>
Reviewed-by: Darrick J. Wong <djwong@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
---
 fs/xfs/xfs_file.c    |  2 +-
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c   | 80 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
 fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h   |  1 +
 fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c |  4 +--
 4 files changed, 80 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-)

diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
index 2ef1930374d2..c3061723613c 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_file.c
@@ -846,7 +846,7 @@ xfs_wait_dax_page(
 	xfs_ilock(ip, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
 }
 
-static int
+int
 xfs_break_dax_layouts(
 	struct inode		*inode,
 	bool			*retry)
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
index a4f6f034fb81..bdc084cdbf46 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.c
@@ -3790,6 +3790,61 @@ xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(
 	return 0;
 }
 
+static int
+xfs_mmaplock_two_inodes_and_break_dax_layout(
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip1,
+	struct xfs_inode	*ip2)
+{
+	int			error, attempts = 0;
+	bool			retry;
+	struct page		*page;
+	struct xfs_log_item	*lp;
+
+	if (ip1->i_ino > ip2->i_ino)
+		swap(ip1, ip2);
+
+again:
+	retry = false;
+	/* Lock the first inode */
+	xfs_ilock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+	error = xfs_break_dax_layouts(VFS_I(ip1), &retry);
+	if (error || retry) {
+		xfs_iunlock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+		if (error == 0 && retry)
+			goto again;
+		return error;
+	}
+
+	if (ip1 == ip2)
+		return 0;
+
+	/* Nested lock the second inode */
+	lp = &ip1->i_itemp->ili_item;
+	if (lp && test_bit(XFS_LI_IN_AIL, &lp->li_flags)) {
+		if (!xfs_ilock_nowait(ip2,
+		    xfs_lock_inumorder(XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, 1))) {
+			xfs_iunlock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+			if ((++attempts % 5) == 0)
+				delay(1); /* Don't just spin the CPU */
+			goto again;
+		}
+	} else
+		xfs_ilock(ip2, xfs_lock_inumorder(XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL, 1));
+	/*
+	 * We cannot use xfs_break_dax_layouts() directly here because it may
+	 * need to unlock & lock the XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL which is not suitable
+	 * for this nested lock case.
+	 */
+	page = dax_layout_busy_page(VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
+	if (page && page_ref_count(page) != 1) {
+		xfs_iunlock(ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+		xfs_iunlock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+		goto again;
+	}
+
+	return 0;
+}
+
 /*
  * Lock two inodes so that userspace cannot initiate I/O via file syscalls or
  * mmap activity.
@@ -3804,8 +3859,19 @@ xfs_ilock2_io_mmap(
 	ret = xfs_iolock_two_inodes_and_break_layout(VFS_I(ip1), VFS_I(ip2));
 	if (ret)
 		return ret;
-	filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
-				    VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
+
+	if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip1)) && IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip2))) {
+		ret = xfs_mmaplock_two_inodes_and_break_dax_layout(ip1, ip2);
+		if (ret) {
+			inode_unlock(VFS_I(ip2));
+			if (ip1 != ip2)
+				inode_unlock(VFS_I(ip1));
+			return ret;
+		}
+	} else
+		filemap_invalidate_lock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+					    VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
+
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -3815,8 +3881,14 @@ xfs_iunlock2_io_mmap(
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip1,
 	struct xfs_inode	*ip2)
 {
-	filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
-				      VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
+	if (IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip1)) && IS_DAX(VFS_I(ip2))) {
+		xfs_iunlock(ip2, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+		if (ip1 != ip2)
+			xfs_iunlock(ip1, XFS_MMAPLOCK_EXCL);
+	} else
+		filemap_invalidate_unlock_two(VFS_I(ip1)->i_mapping,
+					      VFS_I(ip2)->i_mapping);
+
 	inode_unlock(VFS_I(ip2));
 	if (ip1 != ip2)
 		inode_unlock(VFS_I(ip1));
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
index b21b177832d1..f7e26fe31a26 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_inode.h
@@ -472,6 +472,7 @@ enum xfs_prealloc_flags {
 
 int	xfs_update_prealloc_flags(struct xfs_inode *ip,
 				  enum xfs_prealloc_flags flags);
+int	xfs_break_dax_layouts(struct inode *inode, bool *retry);
 int	xfs_break_layouts(struct inode *inode, uint *iolock,
 		enum layout_break_reason reason);
 
diff --git a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
index 9d876e268734..3b99c9dfcf0d 100644
--- a/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
+++ b/fs/xfs/xfs_reflink.c
@@ -1327,8 +1327,8 @@ xfs_reflink_remap_prep(
 	if (XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(src) || XFS_IS_REALTIME_INODE(dest))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
-	/* Don't share DAX file data for now. */
-	if (IS_DAX(inode_in) || IS_DAX(inode_out))
+	/* Don't share DAX file data with non-DAX file. */
+	if (IS_DAX(inode_in) != IS_DAX(inode_out))
 		goto out_unlock;
 
 	if (!IS_DAX(inode_in))
-- 
2.33.0