[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+WzARmsPT46ck17-96cJVWE-=QEK8QobRFnCnEcNxsd42zNTw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 21:11:18 +0800
From: zhenguo yao <yaozhenguo1@...il.com>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>
Cc: corbet@....net, yaozhenguo@...com,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] hugetlbfs: Extend the definition of hugepages
parameter to support node allocation
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> 于2021年9月15日周三 上午11:50写道:
>
> On Thu, 9 Sep 2021 22:16:55 +0800 yaozhenguo <yaozhenguo1@...il.com> wrote:
>
> > We can specify the number of hugepages to allocate at boot. But the
> > hugepages is balanced in all nodes at present. In some scenarios,
> > we only need hugepages in one node. For example: DPDK needs hugepages
> > which are in the same node as NIC. if DPDK needs four hugepages of 1G
> > size in node1 and system has 16 numa nodes. We must reserve 64 hugepages
> > in kernel cmdline. But, only four hugepages are used. The others should
> > be free after boot. If the system memory is low(for example: 64G), it will
> > be an impossible task. So, Extending hugepages parameter to support
> > specifying hugepages at a specific node.
> > For example add following parameter:
> >
> > hugepagesz=1G hugepages=0:1,1:3
> >
> > It will allocate 1 hugepage in node0 and 3 hugepages in node1.
> >
> > ...
> >
> > @@ -2842,10 +2843,75 @@ static void __init gather_bootmem_prealloc(void)
> > }
> > }
> >
> > +static void __init hugetlb_hstate_alloc_pages_onenode(struct hstate *h, int nid)
> > +{
> > + unsigned long i;
> > + char buf[32];
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < h->max_huge_pages_node[nid]; ++i) {
> > + if (hstate_is_gigantic(h)) {
> > + struct huge_bootmem_page *m;
> > + void *addr;
> > +
> > + addr = memblock_alloc_try_nid_raw(
> > + huge_page_size(h), huge_page_size(h),
> > + 0, MEMBLOCK_ALLOC_ACCESSIBLE, nid);
> > + if (!addr)
> > + break;
> > + m = addr;
> > + BUG_ON(!IS_ALIGNED(virt_to_phys(m), huge_page_size(h)));
>
> We try very hard to avoid adding BUG calls. Is there any way in which
> this code can emit a WARNing then permit the kernel to keep operating?
>
Maybe we can rewrite it as below:
if (WARN(!IS_ALIGNED(virt_to_phys(m),
huge_page_size(h)),
"HugeTLB: page addr:%p is not aligned\n", m))
break;
@Mike, Do you think it's OK?
> > + /*
> > + * Put them into a private list first because mem_map
> > + * is not up yet
> > + */
> > + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&m->list);
> > + list_add(&m->list, &huge_boot_pages);
> > + m->hstate = h;
> > + } else {
> > + struct page *page;
> > +
> > + gfp_t gfp_mask = htlb_alloc_mask(h) | __GFP_THISNODE;
> > +
> > + page = alloc_fresh_huge_page(h, gfp_mask, nid,
> > + &node_states[N_MEMORY], NULL);
> > + if (!page)
> > + break;
> > + put_page(page); /* free it into the hugepage allocator */
> > + }
> > + cond_resched();
> > + }
> > + if (i == h->max_huge_pages_node[nid])
> > + return;
> > +
> > + string_get_size(huge_page_size(h), 1, STRING_UNITS_2, buf, 32);
> > + pr_warn("HugeTLB: allocating %u of page size %s failed node%d. Only allocated %lu hugepages.\n",
> > + h->max_huge_pages_node[nid], buf, nid, i);
> > + h->max_huge_pages_node[nid] = i;
> > + h->max_huge_pages -= (h->max_huge_pages_node[nid] - i);
> > +}
> > +
>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists