[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210915151236.GF25255@dragon>
Date: Wed, 15 Sep 2021 23:12:37 +0800
From: Shawn Guo <shawn.guo@...aro.org>
To: Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Loic Poulain <loic.poulain@...aro.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-clk@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/3] clk: qcom: smd-rpm: Add rate hooks for
clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops
On Tue, Sep 14, 2021 at 07:55:21PM -0700, Bjorn Andersson wrote:
> On Mon 13 Sep 19:55 PDT 2021, Shawn Guo wrote:
>
> > On QCM2290 platform, the clock xo_board runs at 38400000, while the
> > child clock bi_tcxo needs to run at 19200000. That said,
> > clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops needs the capability of setting rate. Add rate
> > hooks into clk_smd_rpm_branch_ops to make it possible.
> >
>
> Most platforms has a crystal oscillator ticking at 38.4MHz feeding the
> PMIC (represented by the rpmcc and its "xo" parent) and out comes the
> bi_tcxo with a fixed 19.2MHz rate.
Yeah, but all those platforms are running clk-rpmh driver, I think.
> Is there a problem with the way sdm660_bi_tcxo is defined in this
> regard?
There is no problem if xo clock is 19.2MHz, but for platforms with
38.4MHz xo, bi_tcxo will be seen as 38.4MHz in clock tree, while we
expect it to be 19.2MHz.
Shawn
Powered by blists - more mailing lists