lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <db4648a4-291c-2941-8f76-29a328eaf25e@gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 02:12:26 +0900
From:   Chanwoo Choi <cwchoi00@...il.com>
To:     Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>,
        Chanwoo Choi <cw00.choi@...sung.com>
Cc:     MyungJoo Ham <myungjoo.ham@...sung.com>,
        Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] extcon: extcon-axp288: use low level P-Unit semaphore
 lock for axp288 register accesses

Hi,

On 21. 9. 10. 오후 4:34, Fabio Aiuto wrote:
> use low level P-Unit semaphore lock for axp288 register
> accesses directly and for more than one access a time,
> to reduce the number of times this semaphore is locked
> and released which is an expensive operation.
> 
> i2c-bus to the XPower is shared between the kernel and the
> SoCs P-Unit. The P-Unit has a semaphore wich the kernel must
> lock for axp288 register accesses. When the P-Unit semaphore
> is locked CPU and GPU power states cannot change or the system
> will freeze.
> 
> The P-Unit semaphore lock is already managed inside the regmap
> access logic, but for each access the semaphore is locked and
> released. So use directly iosf_mbi_(un)block_punit_i2c_access(),
> we are safe in doing so because nested calls to the same
> semaphore are turned to nops.
> 
> Suggested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Reviewed-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Tested-by: Hans de Goede <hdegoede@...hat.com>
> Signed-off-by: Fabio Aiuto <fabioaiuto83@...il.com>
> ---
> Changes in v2:
> 	- add a new depends on in Kconfig
> 	- add Tested-by Reviewed-by tags
>   
>   drivers/extcon/Kconfig         |  2 +-
>   drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c | 14 ++++++++++++++
>   2 files changed, 15 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/Kconfig b/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
> index c69d40ae5619..aab87c9b35c8 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/Kconfig
> @@ -23,7 +23,7 @@ config EXTCON_ADC_JACK
>   
>   config EXTCON_AXP288
>   	tristate "X-Power AXP288 EXTCON support"
> -	depends on MFD_AXP20X && USB_SUPPORT && X86 && ACPI
> +	depends on MFD_AXP20X && USB_SUPPORT && X86 && ACPI && IOSF_MBI
>   	select USB_ROLE_SWITCH
>   	help
>   	  Say Y here to enable support for USB peripheral detection
> diff --git a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> index fdb31954cf2b..460402b14ef2 100644
> --- a/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> +++ b/drivers/extcon/extcon-axp288.c
> @@ -24,6 +24,7 @@
>   
>   #include <asm/cpu_device_id.h>
>   #include <asm/intel-family.h>
> +#include <asm/iosf_mbi.h>
>   
>   /* Power source status register */
>   #define PS_STAT_VBUS_TRIGGER		BIT(0)
> @@ -215,6 +216,8 @@ static int axp288_handle_chrg_det_event(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
>   	unsigned int cable = info->previous_cable;
>   	bool vbus_attach = false;
>   
> +	iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();

You have to check the return value of iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access()

> +
>   	vbus_attach = axp288_get_vbus_attach(info);
>   	if (!vbus_attach)
>   		goto no_vbus;
> @@ -253,6 +256,8 @@ static int axp288_handle_chrg_det_event(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
>   	}
>   
>   no_vbus:
> +	iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
> +
>   	extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, info->previous_cable, false);
>   	if (info->previous_cable == EXTCON_CHG_USB_SDP)
>   		extcon_set_state_sync(info->edev, EXTCON_USB, false);
> @@ -275,6 +280,8 @@ static int axp288_handle_chrg_det_event(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
>   	return 0;
>   
>   dev_det_ret:
> +	iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
> +
>   	if (ret < 0)
>   		dev_err(info->dev, "failed to detect BC Mod\n");
>   
> @@ -307,11 +314,14 @@ static irqreturn_t axp288_extcon_isr(int irq, void *data)
>   
>   static void axp288_extcon_enable(struct axp288_extcon_info *info)
>   {
> +	iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();

ditto.

>   	regmap_update_bits(info->regmap, AXP288_BC_GLOBAL_REG,
>   						BC_GLOBAL_RUN, 0);
>   	/* Enable the charger detection logic */
>   	regmap_update_bits(info->regmap, AXP288_BC_GLOBAL_REG,
>   					BC_GLOBAL_RUN, BC_GLOBAL_RUN);
> +
> +	iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
>   }
>   
>   static void axp288_put_role_sw(void *data)
> @@ -384,10 +394,14 @@ static int axp288_extcon_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>   		}
>   	}
>   
> +	iosf_mbi_block_punit_i2c_access();

ditto.

> +
>   	info->vbus_attach = axp288_get_vbus_attach(info);
>   
>   	axp288_extcon_log_rsi(info);
>   
> +	iosf_mbi_unblock_punit_i2c_access();
> +
>   	/* Initialize extcon device */
>   	info->edev = devm_extcon_dev_allocate(&pdev->dev,
>   					      axp288_extcon_cables);
> 


-- 
Best Regards,
Samsung Electronics
Chanwoo Choi

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ