linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 226/306] selftests/bpf: Fix flaky send

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210916155801.749730750@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 17:59:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
        Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 226/306] selftests/bpf: Fix flaky send_signal test

From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>

[ Upstream commit b16ac5bf732a5e23d164cf908ec7742d6a6120d3 ]

libbpf CI has reported send_signal test is flaky although
I am not able to reproduce it in my local environment.
But I am able to reproduce with on-demand libbpf CI ([1]).

Through code analysis, the following is possible reason.
The failed subtest runs bpf program in softirq environment.
Since bpf_send_signal() only sends to a fork of "test_progs"
process. If the underlying current task is
not "test_progs", bpf_send_signal() will not be triggered
and the subtest will fail.

To reduce the chances where the underlying process is not
the intended one, this patch boosted scheduling priority to
-20 (highest allowed by setpriority() call). And I did
10 runs with on-demand libbpf CI with this patch and I
didn't observe any failures.

 [1] https://github.com/libbpf/libbpf/actions/workflows/ondemand.yml

Signed-off-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Signed-off-by: Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20210817190923.3186725-1-yhs@fb.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
 .../selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c       | 16 ++++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
index 7043e6ded0e6..75b72c751772 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/prog_tests/send_signal.c
@@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
 // SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
 #include <test_progs.h>
+#include <sys/time.h>
+#include <sys/resource.h>
 #include "test_send_signal_kern.skel.h"
 
 static volatile int sigusr1_received = 0;
@@ -41,12 +43,23 @@ static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
 	}
 
 	if (pid == 0) {
+		int old_prio;
+
 		/* install signal handler and notify parent */
 		signal(SIGUSR1, sigusr1_handler);
 
 		close(pipe_c2p[0]); /* close read */
 		close(pipe_p2c[1]); /* close write */
 
+		/* boost with a high priority so we got a higher chance
+		 * that if an interrupt happens, the underlying task
+		 * is this process.
+		 */
+		errno = 0;
+		old_prio = getpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0);
+		ASSERT_OK(errno, "getpriority");
+		ASSERT_OK(setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0, -20), "setpriority");
+
 		/* notify parent signal handler is installed */
 		CHECK(write(pipe_c2p[1], buf, 1) != 1, "pipe_write", "err %d\n", -errno);
 
@@ -62,6 +75,9 @@ static void test_send_signal_common(struct perf_event_attr *attr,
 		/* wait for parent notification and exit */
 		CHECK(read(pipe_p2c[0], buf, 1) != 1, "pipe_read", "err %d\n", -errno);
 
+		/* restore the old priority */
+		ASSERT_OK(setpriority(PRIO_PROCESS, 0, old_prio), "setpriority");
+
 		close(pipe_c2p[1]);
 		close(pipe_p2c[0]);
 		exit(0);
-- 
2.30.2