lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210916155803.853938563@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:00:31 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 286/306] s390/pv: fix the forcing of the swiotlb

From: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>

commit 93ebb6828723b8aef114415c4dc3518342f7dcad upstream.

Since commit 903cd0f315fe ("swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for
swiotlb data bouncing") if code sets swiotlb_force it needs to do so
before the swiotlb is initialised. Otherwise
io_tlb_default_mem->force_bounce will not get set to true, and devices
that use (the default) swiotlb will not bounce despite switolb_force
having the value of SWIOTLB_FORCE.

Let us restore swiotlb functionality for PV by fulfilling this new
requirement.

This change addresses what turned out to be a fragility in
commit 64e1f0c531d1 ("s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected
virtualization"), which ain't exactly broken in its original context,
but could give us some more headache if people backport the broken
change and forget this fix.

Signed-off-by: Halil Pasic <pasic@...ux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Reviewed-by: Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>
Fixes: 903cd0f315fe ("swiotlb: Use is_swiotlb_force_bounce for swiotlb data bouncing")
Fixes: 64e1f0c531d1 ("s390/mm: force swiotlb for protected virtualization")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org #5.3+
Signed-off-by: Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk <konrad@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 arch/s390/mm/init.c |    2 +-
 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)

--- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
+++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
@@ -180,9 +180,9 @@ static void pv_init(void)
 		return;
 
 	/* make sure bounce buffers are shared */
+	swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_FORCE;
 	swiotlb_init(1);
 	swiotlb_update_mem_attributes();
-	swiotlb_force = SWIOTLB_FORCE;
 }
 
 void __init mem_init(void)


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ