linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftests: kvm: fscanf warn fixes and cleanups

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 07:06:04 +0200
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Shuah Khan <skhan@...uxfoundation.org>, shuah@...nel.org
Cc:     kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/4] selftests: kvm: fscanf warn fixes and cleanups

On 16/09/21 02:02, Shuah Khan wrote:
> On 9/15/21 4:34 PM, Paolo Bonzini wrote:
>> On 15/09/21 23:28, Shuah Khan wrote:
>>> This patch series fixes fscanf() ignoring return value warnings.
>>> Consolidates get_run_delay() duplicate defines moving it to
>>> common library.
>>>
>>> Shuah Khan (4):
>>>    selftests:kvm: fix get_warnings_count() ignoring fscanf() return warn
>>>    selftests:kvm: fix get_trans_hugepagesz() ignoring fscanf() return
>>>      warn
>>>    selftests: kvm: move get_run_delay() into lib/test_util
>>>    selftests: kvm: fix get_run_delay() ignoring fscanf() return warn
>>>
>>>   .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h |  3 +++
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c   | 22 ++++++++++++++++++-
>>>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/steal_time.c      | 16 --------------
>>>   .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/mmio_warning_test.c  |  3 ++-
>>>   .../selftests/kvm/x86_64/xen_shinfo_test.c    | 15 -------------
>>>   5 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 33 deletions(-)
>>>
>>
>> Acked-by: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
>>
>> Thanks Shuah!
>>
> 
> Thank you. I can take these through linux-kselftest - let me know
> if that causes issues for kvm tree.

Go ahead if it's for 5.15-rc, I don't have any selftests patches pending.

Paolo