[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YULztMRLJ55YLVU9@infradead.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 08:35:16 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>
To: Christophe Leroy <christophe.leroy@...roup.eu>
Cc: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Sathyanarayanan Kuppuswamy
<sathyanarayanan.kuppuswamy@...ux.intel.com>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org, Brijesh Singh <brijesh.singh@....com>,
kvm@...r.kernel.org, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org,
Paul Mackerras <paulus@...ba.org>, linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Andi Kleen <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, x86@...nel.org,
amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
linux-graphics-maintainer@...are.com,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Tianyu Lan <Tianyu.Lan@...rosoft.com>,
kexec@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/8] powerpc/pseries/svm: Add a powerpc version of
cc_platform_has()
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 07:18:34PM +0200, Christophe Leroy wrote:
> Could you please provide more explicit explanation why inlining such an
> helper is considered as bad practice and messy ?
Because now we get architectures to all subly differ. Look at the mess
for ioremap and the ioremap* variant.
The only good reason to allow for inlines if if they are used in a hot
path. Which cc_platform_has is not, especially not on powerpc.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists