[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210916122652.b6ab789e968263eb4ab31626@linux-foundation.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:26:52 -0700
From: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
To: "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
Cc: James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
Chris Mason <clm@...com>, Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
"linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
"ksummit@...ts.linux.dev" <ksummit@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Folios as a potential Kernel/Maintainers
Summit topic?
On Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:15:29 -0400 "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu> wrote:
> What typically happens is if someone were to try to play games like
> this inside, say, the Networking subsystem, past a certain point,
> David Miller will just take the patch series, ignoring people who have
> NACK's down if they can't be justified. The difference is that even
> though Andrew Morton (the titular maintainer for all of Memory
> Management, per the MAINTAINERS file), Andrew seems to have a much
> lighter touch on how the mm subsystem is run.
I do the Dave thing sometimes. We aren't at that point with folios
though. The discussions and objections and approvals are all
substantial and things are still playing out.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists