lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUMfdA36fuyZ+/xt@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:41:56 +0200
From:   Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To:     Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
Cc:     andreyknvl@...il.com, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
        keescook@...omium.org
Subject: [PATCH] mm/vmalloc: Don't allow VM_NO_GUARD on vmap()


The vmalloc guard pages are added on top of each allocation, thereby
isolating any two allocations from one another. The top guard of the
lower allocation is the bottom guard guard of the higher allocation
etc.

Therefore VM_NO_GUARD is dangerous; it breaks the basic premise of
isolating separate allocations.

There are only two in-tree users of this flag, neither of which use it
through the exported interface. Ensure it stays this way.

Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
---
 include/linux/vmalloc.h | 2 +-
 mm/vmalloc.c            | 7 +++++++
 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)

diff --git a/include/linux/vmalloc.h b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
index 671d402c3778..10e9571ff0b2 100644
--- a/include/linux/vmalloc.h
+++ b/include/linux/vmalloc.h
@@ -22,7 +22,7 @@ struct notifier_block;		/* in notifier.h */
 #define VM_USERMAP		0x00000008	/* suitable for remap_vmalloc_range */
 #define VM_DMA_COHERENT		0x00000010	/* dma_alloc_coherent */
 #define VM_UNINITIALIZED	0x00000020	/* vm_struct is not fully initialized */
-#define VM_NO_GUARD		0x00000040      /* don't add guard page */
+#define VM_NO_GUARD		0x00000040      /* ***DANGEROUS*** don't add guard page */
 #define VM_KASAN		0x00000080      /* has allocated kasan shadow memory */
 #define VM_FLUSH_RESET_PERMS	0x00000100	/* reset direct map and flush TLB on unmap, can't be freed in atomic context */
 #define VM_MAP_PUT_PAGES	0x00000200	/* put pages and free array in vfree */
diff --git a/mm/vmalloc.c b/mm/vmalloc.c
index d77830ff604c..01927ebea267 100644
--- a/mm/vmalloc.c
+++ b/mm/vmalloc.c
@@ -2743,6 +2743,13 @@ void *vmap(struct page **pages, unsigned int count,
 
 	might_sleep();
 
+	/*
+	 * Your top guard is someone else's bottom guard. Not having a top
+	 * guard compromises someone else's mappings too.
+	 */
+	if (WARN_ON_ONCE(flags & VM_NO_GUARD))
+		flags &= ~VM_NO_GUARD;
+
 	if (count > totalram_pages())
 		return NULL;
 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ