[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210916124930.7ae3b722@coco.lan>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 12:49:30 +0200
From: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
To: Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com>
Cc: Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
David Beckett <david.beckett@...ronome.com>,
Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...nel.org>, Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org, netdev@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/24] tools: bpftool: update bpftool-prog.rst reference
Hi Quentin,
Em Thu, 16 Sep 2021 10:43:45 +0100
Quentin Monnet <quentin@...valent.com> escreveu:
> 2021-09-16 11:14 UTC+0200 ~ Mauro Carvalho Chehab
> <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> > The file name: Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
> > should be, instead: tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst.
> >
> > Update its cross-reference accordingly.
> >
> > Fixes: a2b5944fb4e0 ("selftests/bpf: Check consistency between bpftool source, doc, completion")
> > Fixes: ff69c21a85a4 ("tools: bpftool: add documentation")
>
> Hi,
> How is this a fix for the commit that added the documentation in bpftool?
>
> > Signed-off-by: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py | 2 +-
> > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
> > index be54b7335a76..27a2c369a798 100755
> > --- a/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
> > +++ b/tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py
> > @@ -374,7 +374,7 @@ class ManProgExtractor(ManPageExtractor):
> > """
> > An extractor for bpftool-prog.rst.
> > """
> > - filename = os.path.join(BPFTOOL_DIR, 'Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst')
> > + filename = os.path.join(BPFTOOL_DIR, 'tools/bpf/bpftool/Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst')
> >
> > def get_attach_types(self):
> > return self.get_rst_list('ATTACH_TYPE')
> >
>
> No I don't believe it should. BPFTOOL_DIR already contains
> 'tools/bpf/bpftool' and the os.path.join() concatenates the two path
> fragments.
>
> Where is this suggestion coming from? Did you face an issue with the script?
No, I didn't face any issues with this script.
The suggestion cames from the script at:
./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
which is meant to discover broken doc references.
Such script has already a rule to handle stuff under tools/:
# Accept relative Documentation patches for tools/
if ($f =~ m/tools/) {
my $path = $f;
$path =~ s,(.*)/.*,$1,;
next if (grep -e, glob("$path/$ref $path/../$ref $path/$fulref"));
}
but it seems it needs a fixup in order for it to stop reporting issues
at test_bpftool_synctypes.py:
$ ./scripts/documentation-file-ref-check
...
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py: Documentation/bpftool-prog.rst
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py: Documentation/bpftool-map.rst
tools/testing/selftests/bpf/test_bpftool_synctypes.py: Documentation/bpftool-cgroup.rst
I'll drop the patches touching it for a next version, probably
adding a fix for such script.
Thanks,
Mauro
Powered by blists - more mailing lists