[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUMofqnG6zE4BrnR@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 13:20:30 +0200
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Gabriel Krisman Bertazi <krisman@...labora.com>
Cc: André Almeida <andrealmeid@...labora.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Darren Hart <dvhart@...radead.org>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>,
kernel@...labora.com, linux-api@...r.kernel.org,
libc-alpha@...rceware.org, mtk.manpages@...il.com,
Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/6] futex2: Implement vectorized wait
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 12:10:25AM -0400, Gabriel Krisman Bertazi wrote:
> I find this weird. I'm not even juts talking about compat, but even on
> native 32-bit. But also, 32 applications on 64, which is a big use
> case for games.
Seriously, people still make 32bit applications today? And for legacy
games, I would think the speed increase of modern CPUs would far offset
this little inefficiency.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists