linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v6 14/19] staging: remove struct _io

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Thu, 16 Sep 2021 15:28:32 +0200
From:   "Fabio M. De Francesco" <fmdefrancesco@...il.com>
To:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
Cc:     Larry Finger <Larry.Finger@...inger.net>,
        Phillip Potter <phil@...lpotter.co.uk>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Pavel Skripkin <paskripkin@...il.com>,
        linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        David Laight <david.Laight@...lab.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v6 14/19] staging: remove struct _io_ops

On Thursday, September 16, 2021 2:52:00 PM CEST Dan Carpenter wrote:
> Patches 1-14 are great.  Those 14 patches are:
> 
> Reviewed-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
> 
> regards,
> dan carpenter
> 
Dear Dan,

Thank you very much for your "Reviewed-by:" tag. We really appreciated it. 
And thanks for the suggestions you gave about the other 5 patches. v7 will be 
made according to them.

As far as it regards to 1-14, I want to point out that the bulk of the work  
was done by Pavel (all the coding). Of course we discussed the general design 
of the 19 patches together, but for the first 14 I just wrote the commit 
messages and subjects and obviously I also reviewed and tested them.

Regards,

Fabio