[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CABgObfYz1b3YO4a9tR02TourLmsnS48RWrOprrsEh=NpbQfjRA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 18:15:34 +0200
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To: Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>
Cc: Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>, kvm <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
"Kernel Mailing List, Linux" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Reiji Watanabe <reijiw@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] KVM: x86: Clean up RESET "emulation"
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 1:08 AM Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com> wrote:
> Add dedicated helpers to emulate RESET instead of having the relevant code
> scattered through vcpu_create() and vcpu_reset(). Paolo, I think this is
> what you meant by "have init_vmcb/svm_vcpu_reset look more like the VMX
> code"[*].
>
> [*] https://lore.kernel.org/all/c3563870-62c3-897d-3148-e48bb755310c@redhat.com/
That assumes that I remember what I meant :) but I do like it so yes,
that was it. Especially the fact that init_vmcb now has a single
caller. I would further consider moving save area initialization to
*_vcpu_reset, and keeping the control fields in init_vmcb/vmcs. That
would make it easier to relate the two functions to separate parts of
the manuals.
I should go back to KVM next week. Context switching with KVM Forum
and Kangrejos this week made everything so much slower than I'd liked.
Paolo
Powered by blists - more mailing lists