[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210917023457.816816-3-sashal@kernel.org>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 22:34:56 -0400
From: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>,
Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>, fabrice.gasnier@...s.st.com,
lee.jones@...aro.org, mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com,
alexandre.torgue@...s.st.com, linux-pwm@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: [PATCH AUTOSEL 4.19 3/4] pwm: stm32-lp: Don't modify HW state in .remove() callback
From: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
[ Upstream commit d44084c93427bb0a9261432db1a8ca76a42d805e ]
A consumer is expected to disable a PWM before calling pwm_put(). And if
they didn't there is hopefully a good reason (or the consumer needs
fixing). Also if disabling an enabled PWM was the right thing to do,
this should better be done in the framework instead of in each low level
driver.
Signed-off-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c | 2 --
1 file changed, 2 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
index 28e1f6413476..e92a14007422 100644
--- a/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
+++ b/drivers/pwm/pwm-stm32-lp.c
@@ -224,8 +224,6 @@ static int stm32_pwm_lp_remove(struct platform_device *pdev)
{
struct stm32_pwm_lp *priv = platform_get_drvdata(pdev);
- pwm_disable(&priv->chip.pwms[0]);
-
return pwmchip_remove(&priv->chip);
}
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists