[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210917182113.nacg5zbjiexmhhjk@offworld>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 11:21:13 -0700
From: Davidlohr Bueso <dave@...olabs.net>
To: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@...nsource.wdc.com>
Cc: linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org, linux-perf-users@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, alistair23@...il.com,
namhyung@...nel.org, jolsa@...hat.com,
alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com, mark.rutland@....com,
acme@...nel.org, dvhart@...radead.org, peterz@...radead.org,
mingo@...hat.com, tglx@...utronix.de, atish.patra@....com,
arnd@...db.de, Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/2] perf benchmark: Call the futex syscall from a
function
On Fri, 17 Sep 2021, Alistair Francis wrote:
>From: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
>
>In preparation for a more complex futex() function let's convert the
>current macro into two functions. We need two functions to avoid
>compiler failures as the macro is overloaded.
>
>This will allow us to include pre-processor conditionals in the futex
>syscall functions.
>
>Signed-off-by: Alistair Francis <alistair.francis@....com>
Acked-by: Davidlohr Bueso <dbueso@...e.de>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists