linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 08/15] drm/radeon: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all() --> DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YUUXlOh0rKcynrPZ@zacax395.localdomain>
Date:   Sat, 18 Sep 2021 00:32:52 +0200
From:   Fernando Ramos <greenfoo@....eu>
To:     Sean Paul <sean@...rly.run>
Cc:     dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, amd-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        intel-gfx@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        freedreno@...ts.freedesktop.org, nouveau@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        linux-renesas-soc@...r.kernel.org, linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 08/15] drm/radeon: cleanup: drm_modeset_lock_all() -->
 DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_BEGIN()

> > +	struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> >  	int i, r;
> > +	int ret;
> 
> Could you please tuck this up with i & r?

Done!


> > -	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > +	DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> 
> You should check ret here

Would it be save to return at this point if the lock fails?

In other words, can I just add this? --> "if (ret) return ret;"


> > +	struct drm_modeset_acquire_ctx ctx;
> >  	int r;
> > +	int ret;
> 
> Same suggestion here, move up with r

Done!


> > -		drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > +		DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> 
> Also check ret here

Same question. Would "if (ret) return ret;" be safe here?


> >  	int i;
> > +	int ret;
> 
> Move up with i

Done!


> > -	drm_modeset_unlock_all(dev);
> > +	DRM_MODESET_LOCK_ALL_END(dev, ctx, ret);
> >  	return 0;

I can also "return ret;" instead of "0".

What happens when a DEFINE_SHOW_ATTRIBUTE'd function returns non-zero? Is it ok?
Or do we want to always return "0" to print whatever we can?