linux-kernel - Re: Folio discussion recap

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <654f9679-8734-3830-2e29-f531eb9aeb0a@toxicpanda.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 19:35:21 -0400
From:   Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
To:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>
Cc:     Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Dave Chinner <david@...morbit.com>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: Folio discussion recap

On 9/17/21 6:25 PM, Theodore Ts'o wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 05:13:10PM -0400, Kent Overstreet wrote:
>> Also: it's become pretty clear to me that we have crappy
>> communications between MM developers and filesystem
>> developers.
> 
> I think one of the challenges has been the lack of an LSF/MM since
> 2019.  And it may be that having *some* kind of ad hoc technical
> discussion given that LSF/MM in 2021 is not happening might be a good
> thing.  I'm sure if we asked nicely, we could use the LPC
> infrasutrcture to set up something, assuming we can find a mutually
> agreeable day or dates.
> 

We have a slot for this in the FS MC, first slot actually, so hopefully 
we can get things hashed out there.  Thanks,

Josef