linux-kernel - Re: data loss when doing ls-remote and piped to command

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2722184.bRktqFsmb4@devpool47>
Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:59:07 +0200
From:   Rolf Eike Beer <eb@...ix.com>
To:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Junio C Hamano <gitster@...ox.com>
Cc:     Git List Mailing <git@...r.kernel.org>,
        Tobias Ulmer <tu@...ix.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: data loss when doing ls-remote and piped to command

Am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021, 22:42:22 CEST schrieb Junio C Hamano:
> Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org> writes:
> > On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 5:17 AM Rolf Eike Beer <eb@...ix.com> wrote:
> >> Am Donnerstag, 16. September 2021, 12:12:48 CEST schrieb Tobias Ulmer:
> >> > > The redirection seems to be an important part of it. I now did:
> >> > > 
> >> > > git ... 2>&1 | sha256sum
> >> > 
> >> > I've tried to reproduce this since yesterday, but couldn't until now:
> >> > 
> >> > 2>&1 made all the difference, took less than a minute.
> > 
> > So if that redirection is what matters, and what causes problems, I
> > can almost guarantee that the reason is very simple:
> > ...
> > Anyway. That was a long email just to tell people it's almost
> > certainly user error, not the kernel.
> 
> Yes, 2>&1 will mix messages from the standard error stream at random
> places in the output, which explains the checksum quite well.

If there would be any errors. The point is: if I run the command with ">/dev/
null" just to the terminals a hundred times there is never any output on 
stderr at all. If I pipe stderr into a file it's empty after all of this (yes, 
I did append, not overwrite).

That the particular construct in this case is sort of nonsense is granted, I 
just hit it because some tool here used some very similar construct and 
suddenly started failing. "less" isn't the original reproducer, it was just 
something I started testing with to be able to easily visually inspect the 
output.

What you need is a _fast_ git server. kernel.org or github.com seem to be too 
slow for this if you don't sit somewhere in their datacenter. Use something in 
your local network, a Xeon E5 with lot's of RAM and connected with 1GBit/s 
Ethernet in my case.

And the reader must be "somewhat" slow. Using sha256sum works reliably for me. 
Using "wc -l" does not, also md5sum and sha1sum are too fast as it seems.

When I run the whole thing with strace I can't see the effect, which isn't 
really surprising. But there is a difference between the cases where I run 
with redirection "2>&1":

ioctl(2, TCGETS, 0x7ffd6f119b10)        = -1 ENOTTY (Inappropriate ioctl for 
device)

and without:

ioctl(2, TCGETS, {B38400 opost isig icanon echo ...}) = 0

AFAICT this is the only place where fd 2 is used at all during the whole time.

Regards,

Eike
-- 
Rolf Eike Beer, emlix GmbH, http://www.emlix.com
Fon +49 551 30664-0, Fax +49 551 30664-11
Gothaer Platz 3, 37083 Göttingen, Germany
Sitz der Gesellschaft: Göttingen, Amtsgericht Göttingen HR B 3160
Geschäftsführung: Heike Jordan, Dr. Uwe Kracke – Ust-IdNr.: DE 205 198 055

emlix - smart embedded open source

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (314 bytes)