[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210917013758.GA2520170@roeck-us.net>
Date: Thu, 16 Sep 2021 18:37:58 -0700
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, Helge Deller <deller@....de>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senpartnership.com>,
John David Anglin <dave.anglin@...l.net>
Subject: Re: [GIT PULL] parisc architecture warning fix for kernel v5.15-rc2
On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 01:25:32PM -0700, Linus Torvalds wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 1:10 PM Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net> wrote:
> >
> > On 9/16/21 1:03 PM, Randy Dunlap wrote:
> > >
> > > Already merged in the net tree.
> >
> > Ah, ok. Sorry for the noise (I already sent that patch).
>
> Well, I _just_ got the networking pull, so now that particular problem
> is solved in my tree too.
>
> There's a few more from your list, but I _think_ they are at least
> mostly pending in other trees and patch queues, so I'll ignore them
> unless told otherwise.
>
> But I've literally set aside this week to just get this mess sorted out.
>
> Not only do I think it's time to just *fix* these damn warning issues,
> but usually the week after rc1 is somewhat quiet since it takes a
> while for people to find regressions.
>
> So I have actually spent more time than I would normally consider
> healthy on code that I in any normal situation wouldn't care about at
> all.
>
> (I realize that Arnd and Guenther are now scoffing at my "normally
> consider healthy" since they have put even more time into this, but
> hey, I usually actively try to avoid reading grotty code in areas I
> don't actually care for).
>
> So if somebody is aware of some warning situation that still remains
> and doesn't seem to have any movement, please point me at all. Maybe
> we can't force-enable -Wall, but I want us to be really really close.
>
Let's say the list is getting small enough to be able to keep track.
Below is my current list of -Werror related build errors, as of
v5.15-rc1-164-gbdb575f87217.
Guenter
---
drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c:1200:12: error: 'tegra_slink_runtime_resume' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
1200 | static int tegra_slink_runtime_resume(struct device *dev)
| ^~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
drivers/spi/spi-tegra20-slink.c:1188:12: error: 'tegra_slink_runtime_suspend' defined but not used [-Werror=unused-function]
1188 | static int tegra_slink_runtime_suspend(struct device *dev)
Affected builds:
alpha:allmodconfig
m68k:allmodconfig
parisc:allmodconfig
s390:allmodconfig
Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210907045358.2138282-1-linux@roeck-us.net/
Status:
Applied to
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/broonie/spi.git for-next
[ I hope that doesn't mean we'll have to wait for v5.16 for a fix ]
---
In file included from arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250.h:28,
from drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c:58:
arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/bcm1480_scd.h:261: error: "M_SPC_CFG_CLEAR" redefined
In file included from arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/sb1250.h:28,
from drivers/watchdog/sb_wdog.c:58:
arch/mips/include/asm/sibyte/bcm1480_scd.h:262: error: "M_SPC_CFG_ENABLE" redefined
Affected builds:
mips:allmodconfig
Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210913073220.1159520-1-liu.yun@linux.dev
Status:
Waiting for pull request from Wim
---
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/ctrl.c: In function 'nvkm_control_mthd_pstate_info':
drivers/gpu/drm/nouveau/nvkm/engine/device/ctrl.c:60:35: error: overflow in conversion from 'int' to '__s8' {aka 'signed char'} changes value from '-251' to '5' [-Werror=overflow]
60 | args->v0.pwrsrc = -ENOSYS;
Affected builds:
parisc:allmodconfig
Background:
args->v0.pwrsrc is s8, -ENOSYS is -251 on parisc
Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210908190817.1213486-1-linux@roeck-us.net/
Status:
No response as of 9/15 (or I missed it)
---
drivers/scsi/ncr53c8xx.c:8000:26: error: 'retrieve_from_waiting_list' defined but not used
Affected builds:
parisc:allmodconfig
Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/r/YTfS/LH5vCN6afDW@ls3530
Status:
Applied to 5.15/scsi-fixes
---
arch/s390/kernel/syscall.c: In function '__do_syscall':
arch/s390/kernel/syscall.c:168:1: error: '__do_syscall' uses dynamic stack allocation
lib/test_kasan.c: In function 'kasan_alloca_oob_right':
lib/test_kasan.c:782:1: error: 'kasan_alloca_oob_right' uses dynamic stack allocation
lib/test_kasan.c: In function 'kasan_alloca_oob_left':
lib/test_kasan.c:767:1: error: 'kasan_alloca_oob_left' uses dynamic stack allocation
Affected builds:
s390:allmodconfig
Background:
s390 defines a configuration flag to mark dynamic stack allocations as
warnings. This causes a build failure with -Werror.
Patch:
https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git/commit/?h=fixes&id=f5711f9df9242446feccf2bdb6fdc06a72ca1010
Status:
Queued in https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/s390/linux.git#fixes
---
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c: In function 'dsi_dump_dsidev_irqs':
drivers/video/fbdev/omap2/omapfb/dss/dsi.c:1623:1: error: the frame size of 1104 bytes is larger than 1024 bytes
and many similar errors. Seen in xtensa:allmodconfig.
Background:
xtensa:allmodconfig enables KASAN which in turn increases stack size
requirements significantly.
Patch:
https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20210912025235.3514761-1-linux@roeck-us.net/
Status:
Queued in https://www.ozlabs.org/~akpm/mmotm/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists