lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <f8561816ab06cedf86138a4ad64e7ff7b33e2c07.camel@HansenPartnership.com>
Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 07:14:11 -0400
From:   James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>
To:     Konstantin Ryabitsev <konstantin@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>
Cc:     Theodore Ts'o <tytso@....edu>,
        Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
        Kent Overstreet <kent.overstreet@...il.com>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "linux-mm@...ck.org" <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        "Darrick J. Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@...radead.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        "ksummit@...ts.linux.dev" <ksummit@...ts.linux.dev>
Subject: Re: [MAINTAINER SUMMIT] Folios as a potential Kernel/Maintainers
 Summit topic?

On Thu, 2021-09-16 at 17:00 -0400, Konstantin Ryabitsev wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 16, 2021 at 08:38:13PM +0000, Chris Mason wrote:
> > Agree here.  Mailing lists make it really hard to figure out when
> > these conflicts are resolved, which is why I love using google docs
> > for that part.
> 
> I would caution that Google docs aren't universally accessible. China
> blocks access to many Google resources, and now Russia purportedly
> does the same. Perhaps a similar effect can be reached with a git
> repository with limited commit access? At least then commits can be
> attested to individual authors.

In days of old, when knights were bold and cloud silos weren't
invented, we had an ancient magic handed down by the old gods who spoke
non type safe languages.  They called it wiki and etherpad ... could we
make use of such tools today without committing heresy against our
cloud overlords?

James


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ