lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 17 Sep 2021 13:44:04 +0200
From:   Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
To:     Heiko Thiery <heiko.thiery@...il.com>,
        Frieder Schrempf <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>
Cc:     devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        Guido Günther <agx@...xcpu.org>,
        Fabio Estevam <festevam@...il.com>,
        Shengjiu Wang <shengjiu.wang@....com>,
        "Angus Ainslie (Purism)" <angus@...ea.ca>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Krzysztof Kozlowski <krzk@...nel.org>,
        Joakim Zhang <qiangqing.zhang@....com>,
        Michael Walle <michael@...le.cc>,
        Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        NXP Linux Team <linux-imx@....com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        Sascha Hauer <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: imx8mm-kontron-n801x-som: do not allow to
 switch off buck2

Am Freitag, dem 17.09.2021 um 09:28 +0200 schrieb Heiko Thiery:
> Hi Frieder,
> 
> Am Mi., 15. Sept. 2021 um 14:09 Uhr schrieb Frieder Schrempf
> <frieder.schrempf@...tron.de>:
> > 
> > On 15.09.21 14:05, Michael Walle wrote:
> > > Am 2021-09-15 14:03, schrieb Heiko Thiery:
> > > > The buck2 output of the PMIC is the VDD core voltage of the cpu.
> > > > Switching off this will poweroff the CPU. Add the 'regulator-always-on'
> > > > property to avoid this.
> > > 
> > > Mh, have this ever worked? Is there a commit which introduced a regression?
> > 
> > Yes, this did work before, even without 'regulator-always-on'. I
> > currently don't understand why this is needed. The regulator is
> > referenced in the CPU nodes as 'cpu-supply'. This should be enough to
> > not disable it as long as the CPU is up.
> 
> I rechecked that with 5.11, 5.10 and 5.9 and I see on all of them the
> same issue:
> 
> [ 31.716031] vdd-5v: disabling
> [ 31.719032] rst-usb-eth2: disabling
> [ 31.722553] buck2: disabling
> 
> While on that I tried to compare with other boards and see that they
> also have the cpu-voltage marked as "regulator-always-on". The only
> exception in dts/freescale is in imx8mq-librem5-devkit.dts [1] that
> has not set this property.
> 
> I agree with you and don't understand why this is happening. Has
> anyone else an explanation?
> 
> [1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/arch/arm64/boot/dts/freescale/imx8mq-librem5-devkit.dts#L319
> 
Maybe your kernel config is missing the cpufreq driver, so you don't
have a consumer of the regulator?

Marking the regulator as always-on seems like the right thing to do,
you don't want to depend on a consumer showing up to make sure that
your CPU voltage isn't cut...

Regards,
Lucas

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ