[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210917124956.2042052-1-eesposit@redhat.com>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 08:49:54 -0400
From: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
To: kvm@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>,
Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>,
Sean Christopherson <seanjc@...gle.com>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Wanpeng Li <wanpengli@...cent.com>,
Jim Mattson <jmattson@...gle.com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
x86@...nel.org, "H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
Subject: [RFC PATCH 0/2] KVM: nSVM: use vmcb_ctrl_area_cached instead
Similar to what is being done for svm save area in the nested
state (svm->nested.save), svm->nested.ctl contains some fields
that are not used. This introduces the possibility of passing
around uninitialized values, producing unnecessary bugs.
RFC: changing svm->nested.ctl however means that all functions
called with svm->nested.ctl or a normal vmcb control area
struct will need to be modified to handle the new struct.
This is the case of vmcb_is_intercept(), which results in an
additional function definition. And this looks a little bit ugly IMO.
Therefore, the aim of this serie is to gather feedback to see
if there is a better way to change svm->nested.ctl
or if it's even worth doing it.
Based-on: <20210917120329.2013766-1-eesposit@...hat.com>
Suggested-by: Maxim Levitsky <mlevitsk@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito <eesposit@...hat.com>
Emanuele Giuseppe Esposito (2):
nSVM: introduce struct vmcb_ctrl_area_cached
nSVM: use vmcb_ctrl_area_cached instead of vmcb_control_area in
svm_nested_state
arch/x86/kvm/svm/nested.c | 74 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.c | 4 +--
arch/x86/kvm/svm/svm.h | 39 ++++++++++++++++++---
3 files changed, 93 insertions(+), 24 deletions(-)
--
2.27.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists