[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210917150952.GA1716923@bjorn-Precision-5520>
Date: Fri, 17 Sep 2021 10:09:52 -0500
From: Bjorn Helgaas <helgaas@...nel.org>
To: Hisashi T Fujinaka <htodd@...fifty.com>
Cc: Dave Jones <davej@...emonkey.org.uk>,
"linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
intel-wired-lan <intel-wired-lan@...ts.osuosl.org>,
Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [Intel-wired-lan] Linux 5.15-rc1 - 82599ES VPD access isue
On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 04:46:54PM -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, Bjorn Helgaas wrote:
>
> > On Wed, Sep 15, 2021 at 09:16:47AM -0700, Hisashi T Fujinaka wrote:
> > > On Wed, 15 Sep 2021, Heiner Kallweit wrote:
> > > > In an earlier mail in this thread was stated that subvendor id is unknown.
> > > > Checking here https://pcisig.com/membership/member-companies?combine=1dcf
> > > > it says: Beijing Sinead Technology Co., Ltd.
> > >
> > > Huh. I didn't realize there was an official list beyond pciids.ucw.cz.
> > >
> > > In any case, that's who you need to talk to about the unlisted (to
> > > Linux) vendor ID and also the odd VPD data.
> >
> > https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/ is definitely unofficial in the sense that it
> > is basically crowd-sourced data, not the "official" Vendor IDs
> > controlled by the PCI SIG.
> >
> > I submitted an addition to https://pci-ids.ucw.cz/
> >
> > Bjorn
>
> Just for my edumacation, do they keep track of device IDs, subvendor IDs
> (which are probably just the same as vendor IDs), and subdevice IDs in
> the PCI SIG? Or even the branding strings?
The PCI SIG does not manage Device IDs. That's the responsibility of
the vendor.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists