lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210918062206.GN2088@kadam>
Date:   Sat, 18 Sep 2021 09:22:06 +0300
From:   Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
To:     cgel.zte@...il.com
Cc:     Larry.Finger@...inger.net, phil@...lpotter.co.uk,
        gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, straube.linux@...il.com,
        martin@...ser.cx, paskripkin@...il.com, nathan@...nel.org,
        saurav.girepunje@...il.com, linux-staging@...ts.linux.dev,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>,
        Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
Subject: Re: [PATCH V2] staging: r8188eu: use ARRAY_SIZE

On Sat, Sep 18, 2021 at 03:39:10AM +0000, cgel.zte@...il.com wrote:
> From: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
> 
> Use ARRAY_SIZE instead of dividing sizeof array with sizeof an element.
> 
> Reported-by: Zeal Robot <zealci@....com.cn>
> Signed-off-by: Changcheng Deng <deng.changcheng@....com.cn>
> ---
>  drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c | 4 +---
>  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 3 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> index d04d2f658ce0..44bee3b2d0ce 100644
> --- a/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> +++ b/drivers/staging/r8188eu/os_dep/usb_intf.c
> @@ -261,10 +261,8 @@ static void process_spec_devid(const struct usb_device_id *pdid)
>  	u16 vid, pid;
>  	u32 flags;
>  	int i;
> -	int num = sizeof(specific_device_id_tbl) /
> -		  sizeof(struct specific_device_id);
>  
> -	for (i = 0; i < num; i++) {
> +	for (i = 0; i < ARRAY_SIZE(specific_device_id_tbl); i++) {

I'm sorry that I didn't review this carefully the first time, but the
specific_device_id_tbl[] array is empty.  This whole function should
just be deleted.

regards,
dan carpenter


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ