[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210918065232.239336-1-yang.guang5@zte.com.cn>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 06:52:32 +0000
From: cgel.zte@...il.com
To: dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com
Cc: luto@...nel.org, peterz@...radead.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
mingo@...hat.com, bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
jan.kiszka@...mens.com, jmoyer@...hat.com,
dan.j.williams@...el.com, neilb@...e.de, yang.guang5@....com.cn,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: [PATCH] Modify the check condition
From: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@....com.cn>
The vma may be NULL, and accessing the member of vma like "vma->vm_start"
in calling follow_phys may occur segmentation fault.
So it should check vma at beginning. If vma is null, it will return. And
the if condition won't execute "vm->vm_flags".
Signed-off-by: Yang Guang <yang.guang5@....com.cn>
---
arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
index 4ba2a3ee4bce..b7108b37b754 100644
--- a/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pat/memtype.c
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@ void untrack_pfn(struct vm_area_struct *vma, unsigned long pfn,
resource_size_t paddr;
unsigned long prot;
- if (vma && !(vma->vm_flags & VM_PAT))
+ if (!(vma) || !(vma->vm_flags & VM_PAT))
return;
/* free the chunk starting from pfn or the whole chunk */
--
2.25.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists