[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210918091706.GB2941@titan>
Date: Sat, 18 Sep 2021 11:17:06 +0200
From: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>
To: Robert Richter <rric@...nel.org>
Cc: Len Baker <len.baker@....com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>,
David Laight <David.Laight@...lab.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
linux-hardening@...r.kernel.org, linux-edac@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] EDAC/mc: Prefer strscpy or scnprintf over strcpy,
sprintf and snprintf
Hi,
On Mon, Sep 13, 2021 at 10:59:10AM +0200, Robert Richter wrote:
> this patch looks good to me. I made some changes on top of it to
> further ease pointer arithmetic and also fix remaining
> sprintf/snprintf() users as it makes sense to have them all in a
> single change. See below. Boris, please apply.
Thanks Robert for doing this.
Regards,
Len
Powered by blists - more mailing lists