[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210920163934.582868188@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:40:00 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>,
Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>,
"Peter Zijlstra (Intel)" <peterz@...radead.org>,
Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>,
Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 4.19 038/293] sched/deadline: Fix missing clock update in migrate_task_rq_dl()
From: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
[ Upstream commit b4da13aa28d4fd0071247b7b41c579ee8a86c81a ]
A missing clock update is causing the following warning:
rq->clock_update_flags < RQCF_ACT_SKIP
WARNING: CPU: 112 PID: 2041 at kernel/sched/sched.h:1453
sub_running_bw.isra.0+0x190/0x1a0
...
CPU: 112 PID: 2041 Comm: sugov:112 Tainted: G W 5.14.0-rc1 #1
Hardware name: WIWYNN Mt.Jade Server System
B81.030Z1.0007/Mt.Jade Motherboard, BIOS 1.6.20210526 (SCP:
1.06.20210526) 2021/05/26
...
Call trace:
sub_running_bw.isra.0+0x190/0x1a0
migrate_task_rq_dl+0xf8/0x1e0
set_task_cpu+0xa8/0x1f0
try_to_wake_up+0x150/0x3d4
wake_up_q+0x64/0xc0
__up_write+0xd0/0x1c0
up_write+0x4c/0x2b0
cppc_set_perf+0x120/0x2d0
cppc_cpufreq_set_target+0xe0/0x1a4 [cppc_cpufreq]
__cpufreq_driver_target+0x74/0x140
sugov_work+0x64/0x80
kthread_worker_fn+0xe0/0x230
kthread+0x138/0x140
ret_from_fork+0x10/0x18
The task causing this is the `cppc_fie` DL task introduced by
commit 1eb5dde674f5 ("cpufreq: CPPC: Add support for frequency
invariance").
With CONFIG_ACPI_CPPC_CPUFREQ_FIE=y and schedutil cpufreq governor on
slow-switching system (like on this Ampere Altra WIWYNN Mt. Jade Arm
Server):
DL task `curr=sugov:112` lets `p=cppc_fie` migrate and since the latter
is in `non_contending` state, migrate_task_rq_dl() calls
sub_running_bw()->__sub_running_bw()->cpufreq_update_util()->
rq_clock()->assert_clock_updated()
on p.
Fix this by updating the clock for a non_contending task in
migrate_task_rq_dl() before calling sub_running_bw().
Reported-by: Bruno Goncalves <bgoncalv@...hat.com>
Signed-off-by: Dietmar Eggemann <dietmar.eggemann@....com>
Signed-off-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel) <peterz@...radead.org>
Reviewed-by: Daniel Bristot de Oliveira <bristot@...nel.org>
Acked-by: Juri Lelli <juri.lelli@...hat.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20210804135925.3734605-1-dietmar.eggemann@arm.com
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
kernel/sched/deadline.c | 1 +
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
diff --git a/kernel/sched/deadline.c b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
index 9b2bb5f3ce09..beec5081a55a 100644
--- a/kernel/sched/deadline.c
+++ b/kernel/sched/deadline.c
@@ -1654,6 +1654,7 @@ static void migrate_task_rq_dl(struct task_struct *p, int new_cpu __maybe_unused
*/
raw_spin_lock(&rq->lock);
if (p->dl.dl_non_contending) {
+ update_rq_clock(rq);
sub_running_bw(&p->dl, &rq->dl);
p->dl.dl_non_contending = 0;
/*
--
2.30.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists