linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:16:13 +0100
From:   David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>
To:     Steve French <smfrench@...il.com>
Cc:     dhowells@...hat.com, linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Jeff Layton <jlayton@...nel.org>,
        Dominique Martinet <asmadeus@...ewreck.org>,
        Marc Dionne <marc.dionne@...istor.com>,
        Steve French <sfrench@...ba.org>,
        Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@...merspace.com>,
        Anna Schumaker <anna.schumaker@...app.com>,
        Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
        v9fs-developer@...ts.sourceforge.net,
        linux-afs@...ts.infradead.org, CIFS <linux-cifs@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-nfs <linux-nfs@...r.kernel.org>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH] fscache, 9p, afs, cifs, nfs: Deal with some warnings from W=1

Steve French <smfrench@...il.com> wrote:

> For the cifs ones in connect.c (and also ioctl.c), I had submitted a
> patch in rc1 for these (haven't heard back on that) but did not submit
> kerneldoc fixup for fs/cifs/misc.c.  They seem trivial and safe, do
> you want to split those out and I can put them in?

I can, though the reason I did the patch is that the warnings are always
popping up in what I'm doing.  I can drop the patch from mine when I'm done, I
guess.

David