[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210920163938.309822216@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:43:50 +0200
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Zhenpeng Lin <zplin@....edu>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 212/260] dccp: dont duplicate ccid when cloning dccp sock
From: Lin, Zhenpeng <zplin@....edu>
commit d9ea761fdd197351890418acd462c51f241014a7 upstream.
Commit 2677d2067731 ("dccp: don't free ccid2_hc_tx_sock ...") fixed
a UAF but reintroduced CVE-2017-6074.
When the sock is cloned, two dccps_hc_tx_ccid will reference to the
same ccid. So one can free the ccid object twice from two socks after
cloning.
This issue was found by "Hadar Manor" as well and assigned with
CVE-2020-16119, which was fixed in Ubuntu's kernel. So here I port
the patch from Ubuntu to fix it.
The patch prevents cloned socks from referencing the same ccid.
Fixes: 2677d2067731410 ("dccp: don't free ccid2_hc_tx_sock ...")
Signed-off-by: Zhenpeng Lin <zplin@....edu>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@...emloft.net>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
net/dccp/minisocks.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
--- a/net/dccp/minisocks.c
+++ b/net/dccp/minisocks.c
@@ -94,6 +94,8 @@ struct sock *dccp_create_openreq_child(c
newdp->dccps_role = DCCP_ROLE_SERVER;
newdp->dccps_hc_rx_ackvec = NULL;
newdp->dccps_service_list = NULL;
+ newdp->dccps_hc_rx_ccid = NULL;
+ newdp->dccps_hc_tx_ccid = NULL;
newdp->dccps_service = dreq->dreq_service;
newdp->dccps_timestamp_echo = dreq->dreq_timestamp_echo;
newdp->dccps_timestamp_time = dreq->dreq_timestamp_time;
Powered by blists - more mailing lists