linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 003/122] io_uring: ensure symmetry in handling iter types in loop_rw

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210920163915.872920929@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:42:55 +0200
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Valentina Palmiotti <vpalmiotti@...il.com>,
        Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 003/122] io_uring: ensure symmetry in handling iter types in loop_rw_iter()

From: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>

commit 16c8d2df7ec0eed31b7d3b61cb13206a7fb930cc upstream.

When setting up the next segment, we check what type the iter is and
handle it accordingly. However, when incrementing and processed amount
we do not, and both iter advance and addr/len are adjusted, regardless
of type. Split the increment side just like we do on the setup side.

Fixes: 4017eb91a9e7 ("io_uring: make loop_rw_iter() use original user supplied pointers")
Cc: stable@...r.kernel.org
Reported-by: Valentina Palmiotti <vpalmiotti@...il.com>
Reviewed-by: Pavel Begunkov <asml.silence@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
---
 fs/io_uring.c |    9 ++++++---
 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)

--- a/fs/io_uring.c
+++ b/fs/io_uring.c
@@ -3206,12 +3206,15 @@ static ssize_t loop_rw_iter(int rw, stru
 				ret = nr;
 			break;
 		}
+		if (!iov_iter_is_bvec(iter)) {
+			iov_iter_advance(iter, nr);
+		} else {
+			req->rw.len -= nr;
+			req->rw.addr += nr;
+		}
 		ret += nr;
 		if (nr != iovec.iov_len)
 			break;
-		req->rw.len -= nr;
-		req->rw.addr += nr;
-		iov_iter_advance(iter, nr);
 	}
 
 	return ret;