lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUhTwPhva5olB87d@linux.ibm.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 12:26:24 +0300
From:   Mike Rapoport <rppt@...ux.ibm.com>
To:     Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-tip-commits@...r.kernel.org,
        marmarek@...isiblethingslab.com, Juergen Gross <jgross@...e.com>,
        Borislav Petkov <bp@...e.de>, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [tip: x86/urgent] x86/setup: Call early_reserve_memory() earlier

Hi,

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 02:56:15AM +0200, Mike Galbraith wrote:
> On Sun, 2021-09-19 at 20:04 +0300, Mike Rapoport wrote:
> >
> > Can you please send the boot log of a working kernel up to
> >
> > "Memory: %luK/%luK available"
> >
> > line for both of them?
> 
> Desktop box:
> [    0.000000] microcode: microcode updated early to revision 0x28, date = 2019-11-12
> [    0.000000] Linux version 5.15.0.g02770d1-tip (root@...er) (gcc (SUSE Linux) 7.5.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils; SUSE Linux Enterprise 15) 2.35.1.20201123-7.18) #46 SMP Sun Sep 19 18:42:41 CEST 2021
> [    0.000000] Command line: BOOT_IMAGE=/boot/vmlinuz-5.15.0.g02770d1-tip root=UUID=891c2a1f-cc1a-464b-a529-ab6add65aa21 scsi_mod.use_blk_mq=1 ftrace_dump_on_oops skew_tick=1 nortsched nodelayacct audit=0 cgroup_disable=memory cgroup_hide=all mitigations=off noresume panic=60 ignore_loglevel showopts crashkernel=204M

Thanks!
Can't say anything caught my eye, except the early microcode update.
Just to rule that out, can you try booting without the early microcode
update?

And, to check Juergen's suggestion about failure in
memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data(), can you try this patch on top of
the failing tip:

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
index 25425edc81a4..78162d9e90cf 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/setup.c
@@ -716,8 +716,6 @@ static void __init early_reserve_memory(void)
 	if (efi_enabled(EFI_BOOT))
 		efi_memblock_x86_reserve_range();
 
-	memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data();
-
 	reserve_ibft_region();
 	reserve_bios_regions();
 	trim_snb_memory();
@@ -888,6 +886,8 @@ void __init setup_arch(char **cmdline_p)
 	 */
 	x86_configure_nx();
 
+	memblock_x86_reserve_range_setup_data();
+
 	parse_early_param();
 
 #ifdef CONFIG_MEMORY_HOTPLUG

-- 
Sincerely yours,
Mike.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ