linux-kernel - [PATCH 2/8] x86/process: Clear PASID state for a newly forked/cloned thread

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20210920192349.2602141-3-fenghua.yu@intel.com>
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 19:23:43 +0000
From:   Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
To:     "Thomas Gleixner" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "Ingo Molnar" <mingo@...hat.com>, "Borislav Petkov" <bp@...en8.de>,
        "Peter Zijlstra" <peterz@...radead.org>,
        "Andy Lutomirski" <luto@...nel.org>,
        "Dave Hansen" <dave.hansen@...el.com>,
        "Tony Luck" <tony.luck@...el.com>,
        "Lu Baolu" <baolu.lu@...ux.intel.com>,
        "Joerg Roedel" <joro@...tes.org>,
        Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
        "Dave Jiang" <dave.jiang@...el.com>,
        "Jacob Jun Pan" <jacob.jun.pan@...el.com>,
        "Ashok Raj" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Ravi V Shankar" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>
Cc:     iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, "x86" <x86@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Subject: [PATCH 2/8] x86/process: Clear PASID state for a newly forked/cloned thread

The PASID state has to be cleared on forks, since the child has a
different address space. The PASID is also cleared for thread clone. While
it would be correct to inherit the PASID in this case, it is unknown
whether the new task will use ENQCMD. Giving it the PASID "just in case"
would have the downside of increased context switch overhead to setting
the PASID MSR and losing init optimization.

Since #GP faults have to be handled on any threads that were created before
the PASID was assigned to the mm of the process, newly created threads
might as well be treated in a consistent way.

Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck <tony.luck@...el.com>
---
 arch/x86/kernel/process.c | 8 ++++++++
 1 file changed, 8 insertions(+)

diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
index 1d9463e3096b..c713986ef7d7 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/process.c
@@ -154,6 +154,14 @@ int copy_thread(unsigned long clone_flags, unsigned long sp, unsigned long arg,
 	frame->flags = X86_EFLAGS_FIXED;
 #endif
 
+	if (static_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ENQCMD)) {
+		/*
+		 * Clear the PASID bit in xfeatures so that the PASID MSR
+		 * will be initialized as init state (0).
+		 */
+		p->thread.fpu.state.xsave.header.xfeatures &= ~XFEATURE_MASK_PASID;
+	}
+
 	/* Kernel thread ? */
 	if (unlikely(p->flags & PF_KTHREAD)) {
 		p->thread.pkru = pkru_get_init_value();
-- 
2.33.0