[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YUj1XnBbyNEqrV2g@robh.at.kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:55:58 -0500
From: Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>
Cc: airlied@...ux.ie, daniel@...ll.ch, matthias.bgg@...il.com,
maarten.lankhorst@...ux.intel.com, mripard@...nel.org,
tzimmermann@...e.de, ohad@...ery.com, bjorn.andersson@...aro.org,
mathieu.poirier@...aro.org, sumit.semwal@...aro.org,
christian.koenig@....com, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-remoteproc@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
linaro-mm-sig@...ts.linaro.org, khilman@...libre.com,
gpain@...libre.com
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/4] dt-bindings: Add bidings for mtk,apu-drm
On Fri, Sep 17, 2021 at 02:59:42PM +0200, Alexandre Bailon wrote:
> This adds the device tree bindings for the APU DRM driver.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Bailon <abailon@...libre.com>
> ---
> .../devicetree/bindings/gpu/mtk,apu-drm.yaml | 38 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 38 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/mtk,apu-drm.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/mtk,apu-drm.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/mtk,apu-drm.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 0000000000000..6f432d3ea478c
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/gpu/mtk,apu-drm.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/gpu/mediatek,apu-drm.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: AI Processor Unit DRM
DRM is a linux thing, not h/w.
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: mediatek,apu-drm
> +
> + remoteproc:
So is remoteproc.
Why don't you have the remoteproc driver create the DRM device?
> + maxItems: 2
> + description:
> + Handle to remoteproc devices controlling the APU
> +
> + iova:
> + maxItems: 1
> + description:
> + Address and size of virtual memory that could used by the APU
Why does this need to be in DT? If you need to reserve certain VAs, then
this discussion[1] might be of interest.
Rob
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/all/YUIPCxnyRutMS47%2F@orome.fritz.box/
Powered by blists - more mailing lists