lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 18:25:14 +0100
From:   Matthew Wilcox <>
To:     Bartosz Golaszewski <>
Cc:     Geert Uytterhoeven <>,
        Christoph Hellwig <>,
        Joel Becker <>,
        Shuah Khan <>,
        Linus Walleij <>,
        Andy Shevchenko <>,
        Uwe Kleine-K├Ânig 
        Kent Gibson <>,
        Jonathan Corbet <>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <>,
        Al Viro <>,
        Jack Winch <>,
        "open list:GPIO SUBSYSTEM" <>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <>,
        "open list:DOCUMENTATION" <>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 2/8] configfs: use BIT() for internal flags

On Mon, Sep 20, 2021 at 05:00:10PM +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote:
> Anyway, I'm more interested in Al's comments on the implementation of
> committable items than bikeshedding about whether to use or not to use
> BIT() so I'll wait for those before revisiting this patch.

This isn't bikeshedding.  Bikeshedding is when lots of people weigh in
with opinions on what you should do.  This is you failing to listen
to the maintainer of the code you're changing.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists