lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 15:57:55 -0700
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <>
To:     Chao Yu <>
Cc:     Daeho Jeong <>,
        Daeho Jeong <>,,,
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v4] f2fs: introduce fragment allocation mode
 mount option

On 09/12, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2021/9/11 7:13, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > Wait. Why do we need to add so many options here? I was expecting to see
> > performance difference when getting random segments or random blocks as
> > an extreme case. I don't get the point why we need the middle of those cases.
> I guess we can simply the aging test procedure of filesystem by changing a bit
> based on this patch.

My question was on "fragment:fixed_block".

> See comments in below thread.
> Thanks,

Powered by blists - more mailing lists