[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-id: <163218069080.3992.14261132300912173043@noble.neil.brown.name>
Date: Tue, 21 Sep 2021 09:31:30 +1000
From: "NeilBrown" <neilb@...e.de>
To: "Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Cc: "Linux-MM" <linux-mm@...ck.org>, "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>,
"Andreas Dilger" <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
"Darrick J . Wong" <djwong@...nel.org>,
"Matthew Wilcox" <willy@...radead.org>,
"Michal Hocko" <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Dave Chinner" <david@...morbit.com>,
"Rik van Riel" <riel@...riel.com>,
"Vlastimil Babka" <vbabka@...e.cz>,
"Johannes Weiner" <hannes@...xchg.org>,
"Jonathan Corbet" <corbet@....net>,
"Linux-fsdevel" <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
"LKML" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"Mel Gorman" <mgorman@...hsingularity.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] mm/vmscan: Throttle reclaim when no progress is being made
On Mon, 20 Sep 2021, Mel Gorman wrote:
> +
> + reclaim_throttle(pgdat, VMSCAN_THROTTLE_NOPROGRESS, HZ/10);
We always seem to pass "HZ/10" to reclaim_throttle(). Should we just
hard-code that in the one place inside reclaim_throttle() itself?
NeilBrown
Powered by blists - more mailing lists