linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 07/12] power: reset: Add lan966x power reset driver

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YUh7ammFjBHj3Kj8@lunn.ch>
Date:   Mon, 20 Sep 2021 14:15:38 +0200
From:   Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>
To:     Horatiu Vultur <horatiu.vultur@...rochip.com>
Cc:     davem@...emloft.net, kuba@...nel.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        linux@...linux.org.uk, f.fainelli@...il.com,
        alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com, vladimir.oltean@....com,
        UNGLinuxDriver@...rochip.com, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-phy@...ts.infradead.org, linux-pm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH net-next 07/12] power: reset: Add lan966x power reset
 driver

> +struct lan966x_reset_context {
> +	struct regmap *gcb_ctrl;
> +	struct regmap *cpu_ctrl;
> +	struct notifier_block restart_handler;
> +};
> +
> +#define PROTECT_REG    0x88
> +#define PROTECT_BIT    BIT(5)
> +#define SOFT_RESET_REG 0x00
> +#define SOFT_RESET_BIT BIT(1)
> +
> +static int lan966x_restart_handle(struct notifier_block *this,
> +				  unsigned long mode, void *cmd)
> +{
> +	struct lan966x_reset_context *ctx = container_of(this, struct lan966x_reset_context,
> +							restart_handler);
> +
> +	/* Make sure the core is not protected from reset */
> +	regmap_update_bits(ctx->cpu_ctrl, PROTECT_REG, PROTECT_BIT, 0);

This all looks familiar...

Maybe yet another compatible added to reset-microchip-sparx5.c ?

      Andrew